Skip to content

PB-1754: use "test" npm targets also on the CI#1360

Merged
pakb merged 1 commit intodevelopfrom
feat-PB-1754-use-test-target-on-CI
Jun 5, 2025
Merged

PB-1754: use "test" npm targets also on the CI#1360
pakb merged 1 commit intodevelopfrom
feat-PB-1754-use-test-target-on-CI

Conversation

@pakb
Copy link
Contributor

@pakb pakb commented Jun 5, 2025

the CI is currently running the project using preview:dev target, which isn't ideal, because we run the test target locally (it can lead to differences, and failing tests).

So here I add a preview:test target, that uses the correcte Vite mode "test", I'll change the CI after this is merged, to use it (and have both local and CI tests using the test target)

Test link

the CI is currently running the project using preview:dev target, which isn't ideal, because we run the test target locally (it can lead to differences, and failing tests).

So here I add a preview:test target, that uses the correcte Vite mode "test", I'll change the CI after this is merged, to use it (and have both local and CI tests using the test target)
@cypress
Copy link

cypress bot commented Jun 5, 2025

web-mapviewer    Run #5411

Run Properties:  status check passed Passed #5411  •  git commit beec03827c: PB-1754: use "test" npm targets also on the CI
Project web-mapviewer
Branch Review feat-PB-1754-use-test-target-on-CI
Run status status check passed Passed #5411
Run duration 05m 47s
Commit git commit beec03827c: PB-1754: use "test" npm targets also on the CI
Committer Pascal Barth
View all properties for this run ↗︎

Test results
Tests that failed  Failures 0
Tests that were flaky  Flaky 0
Tests that did not run due to a developer annotating a test with .skip  Pending 20
Tests that did not run due to a failure in a mocha hook  Skipped 0
Tests that passed  Passing 252
View all changes introduced in this branch ↗︎

@pakb pakb merged commit 081a41b into develop Jun 5, 2025
6 checks passed
@pakb pakb deleted the feat-PB-1754-use-test-target-on-CI branch June 5, 2025 07:01
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants