Skip to content

feat: add OpenAI Codex OAuth provider#698

Closed
perlantir wants to merge 1 commit into
garrytan:masterfrom
perlantir:feat/hermes-codex-oauth-provider
Closed

feat: add OpenAI Codex OAuth provider#698
perlantir wants to merge 1 commit into
garrytan:masterfrom
perlantir:feat/hermes-codex-oauth-provider

Conversation

@perlantir

@perlantir perlantir commented May 7, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Summary

  • Adds a chat-only openai-codex provider that reuses existing Hermes/Codex OAuth auth files instead of requiring OPENAI_API_KEY.
  • Adds a safe OAuth loader/refresh path with token redaction and no credential printing.
  • Wires Codex chat through the Codex Responses endpoint and documents the implementation plan/limits.

Security notes

  • Does not export OAuth access/refresh tokens to env vars.
  • Tests use fake token values only.
  • Codex OAuth is chat-only; embeddings remain on supported embedding providers such as Ollama/OpenAI API-key providers.

Test plan

  • bun test test/ai/codex-oauth.test.ts
  • bun test test/ai
  • bun run typecheck
  • bun run check:privacy
  • bun run check:newlines
  • gbrain providers list | grep -i openai-codex

View in Codesmith
Need help on this PR? Tag @codesmith with what you need.

  • Let Codesmith autofix CI failures and bot reviews

@garrytan

garrytan commented Jun 8, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Thanks for this contribution — and apologies for the slow triage. We did a full pass over the entire PR backlog. gbrain has moved fast, and the maintainer's larger "cathedral" rewrites have superseded a big share of community PRs: the AI gateway + recipes + user_provided_models system replaced almost all individual provider PRs; #1805 fixed the whole Postgres module-singleton class; #1542 unified the type taxonomy; #1657 the retrieval path; #1802 the doctor; and so on.

We're closing this one in that cleanup — either the fix already landed on master, it duplicates another PR or merged change, or it's outside the current merge bar. Where a closed PR carried a genuinely valuable idea, we've recorded it in docs/designs/COMMUNITY_IDEAS.md so nothing good is lost (a few may graduate into TODOs).

Please don't read the close as a judgment of the work — thank you for contributing. If you believe the underlying issue is still live on the latest master, reopen with a quick note and we'll take another look. 🙏

@garrytan garrytan closed this Jun 8, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants