ci: Use a hash for the labeler version instead of a tag#230
Merged
llucax merged 1 commit intofrequenz-floss:v0.x.xfrom Mar 28, 2024
Merged
ci: Use a hash for the labeler version instead of a tag#230llucax merged 1 commit intofrequenz-floss:v0.x.xfrom
llucax merged 1 commit intofrequenz-floss:v0.x.xfrom
Conversation
For security reasons, since we are allowing access to secrets, we should use a hash instead of a tag. Signed-off-by: Leandro Lucarella <luca-frequenz@llucax.com>
Contributor
Author
|
Enabling auto-merge. |
Marenz
approved these changes
Mar 28, 2024
tiyash-basu-frequenz
approved these changes
Mar 28, 2024
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
For security reasons, since we are allowing access to secrets, we should use a hash instead of a tag.