What's needed?
We do not need to distinguish between the hot and cold standby commands. Currently, they are used only for inverters, and the HotStandby command for most inverters corresponds to just sending a discharge(0) command (internally). So we could simplify the API by removing the HotStandby command, and renaming the ColdStandby command to Standby.
The Standby command should serve 2 functions:
- It should bring the component from an operational state to a state where it consumes lower-than-usual energy.
- It could take some time for a component to move to an operational state, once this command is issued.
Proposed solution
No response
Use cases
No response
Alternatives and workarounds
No response
Additional context
No response
What's needed?
We do not need to distinguish between the hot and cold standby commands. Currently, they are used only for inverters, and the
HotStandbycommand for most inverters corresponds to just sending adischarge(0)command (internally). So we could simplify the API by removing theHotStandbycommand, and renaming theColdStandbycommand toStandby.The
Standbycommand should serve 2 functions:Proposed solution
No response
Use cases
No response
Alternatives and workarounds
No response
Additional context
No response