Skip to content

31% regression in 90th_percentile_frame_rasterizer_time_millis for new gallery #177016

@gaaclarke

Description

@gaaclarke

Introduced in #173860

The PR that introduced the change was at the framework level. I want to make sure that the regression in performance was expected and a good tradeoff for the value the PR adds.

I mentioned this last week but got not response on the PR.

Image

link

https://flutter-flutter-perf.luci.app/e/?begin=1755206341&enable_chart_tooltip=true&end=1755297711&plotSummary=true&queries=sub_result%3D90th_percentile_frame_rasterizer_time_millis%26test%3Dnew_gallery__transition_perf&requestType=0&show_google_plot=true&use_titles=true&request_type=0&graph=0&commit=2803852&trace=3

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

P1High-priority issues at the top of the work listc: performanceRelates to speed or footprint issues (see "perf:" labels)team-frameworkOwned by Framework teamtriaged-frameworkTriaged by Framework team

Type

No type

Projects

No projects

Milestone

No milestone

Relationships

None yet

Development

No branches or pull requests

Issue actions