Merged
Conversation
dpetran
reviewed
Aug 23, 2024
…factor/nameservice-protocol
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This patch adds a "storage-backed" nameservice (better name suggestions welcome!) to replace the file, memory, and s3 nameservice implementations. The storage-backed nameservice uses a generic store that implements the
fluree.db.storage/Storageprotocol, so we can decide where the storage-backed nameservice stores its data based on what kind of storage implementation we pass to it.These changes are based on #876 (despite the numbering) so please review that first if you haven't already.