Skip to content

Conversation

@omerap12
Copy link
Member

@omerap12 omerap12 commented Aug 23, 2024

Ⅰ. Describe what this PR does

Remove unused functions.

Ⅱ. Does this pull request fix one issue?

Refer to this comment: #991 (comment)

fixes #991

Ⅲ. List the added test cases (unit test/integration test) if any, please explain if no tests are needed.

Ⅳ. Describe how to verify it

Ⅴ. Special notes for reviews

@fluid-e2e-bot
Copy link

fluid-e2e-bot bot commented Aug 23, 2024

Hi @omerap12. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a fluid-cloudnative member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@omerap12 omerap12 force-pushed the dataset_nodeAffinity branch from 74c8de3 to cec481b Compare August 26, 2024 06:59
@omerap12 omerap12 changed the title Dataset node affinity clean-up: remove unused functions Aug 26, 2024
Signed-off-by: Omer Aplatony <omerap12@gmail.com>
@omerap12 omerap12 force-pushed the dataset_nodeAffinity branch from 5c8b770 to d8aba10 Compare August 26, 2024 07:09
Signed-off-by: Omer Aplatony <omerap12@gmail.com>
@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

@omerap12
Copy link
Member Author

@TrafalgarZZZ, would you like me to squash my commits?

@omerap12 omerap12 marked this pull request as ready for review August 26, 2024 07:38
@TrafalgarZZZ
Copy link
Member

@TrafalgarZZZ, would you like me to squash my commits?

We will "Squash and merge" your PR to master branch so it's okay.

Copy link
Member

@TrafalgarZZZ TrafalgarZZZ left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @omerap12 for the PR! LGTM!
/lgtm

@cheyang Please take a look and merge it if there's no further comments

@cheyang
Copy link
Collaborator

cheyang commented Aug 27, 2024

/test fluid-e2e

Copy link
Collaborator

@cheyang cheyang left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm
/approve

@fluid-e2e-bot
Copy link

fluid-e2e-bot bot commented Aug 27, 2024

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: cheyang

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@cheyang
Copy link
Collaborator

cheyang commented Aug 27, 2024

Thanks @omerap12 for the PR! LGTM! /lgtm

@cheyang Please take a look and merge it if there's no further comments

LGTM. Thanks @omerap12 and @TrafalgarZZZ

@omerap12
Copy link
Member Author

Thanks @omerap12 for the PR! LGTM! /lgtm

@cheyang Please take a look and merge it if there's no further comments

LGTM. Thanks @omerap12 and @TrafalgarZZZ

No problem at all. Please ping me if you have any more issues for me to solve 😀

@fluid-e2e-bot fluid-e2e-bot bot merged commit 6e33346 into fluid-cloudnative:master Aug 27, 2024
@omerap12 omerap12 deleted the dataset_nodeAffinity branch August 27, 2024 05:06
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[FEATURES] Dataset nodeAffinity should support matchFields

3 participants