Skip to content

Conversation

@dennisdoomen
Copy link
Member

@dennisdoomen dennisdoomen commented Jun 22, 2025

Triggered by dennisdoomen/dotnet-library-starter-kit#31, I decided to revisit the .editorconfig and use it in FA as well. This triggered a bunch of improvements and fine-tuning.

Can be reviewed commit by commit.

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jun 22, 2025

Qodana for .NET

It seems all right 👌

No new problems were found according to the checks applied

💡 Qodana analysis was run in the pull request mode: only the changed files were checked
☁️ View the detailed Qodana report

Contact Qodana team

Contact us at qodana-support@jetbrains.com

@dennisdoomen dennisdoomen force-pushed the refactor/cleanup-editor-config branch 5 times, most recently from 026be7d to 8755893 Compare June 23, 2025 18:05
@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Jun 23, 2025

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 15954300159

Details

  • 125 of 128 (97.66%) changed or added relevant lines in 25 files are covered.
  • 2 unchanged lines in 2 files lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage increased (+0.004%) to 97.323%

Changes Missing Coverage Covered Lines Changed/Added Lines %
Src/FluentAssertions/CallerIdentifier.cs 1 2 50.0%
Src/FluentAssertions/Common/KeyValuePairCollectionExtensions.cs 10 12 83.33%
Files with Coverage Reduction New Missed Lines %
Src/FluentAssertions/Equivalency/Steps/EnumEqualityStep.cs 1 97.5%
Src/FluentAssertions/Execution/TUnitFramework.cs 1 80.0%
Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 15843385706: 0.004%
Covered Lines: 12504
Relevant Lines: 12703

💛 - Coveralls

@dennisdoomen dennisdoomen force-pushed the refactor/cleanup-editor-config branch 2 times, most recently from bb204da to 83fda36 Compare June 26, 2025 19:48
@dennisdoomen
Copy link
Member Author

dennisdoomen commented Jun 26, 2025

@jnyrup I didn't make any changes other than rework on your comments, but I tried to split the modifications in a bunch of commits for clarity.

@dennisdoomen dennisdoomen requested a review from jnyrup June 26, 2025 19:49
@dennisdoomen dennisdoomen marked this pull request as ready for review June 26, 2025 19:50
@dennisdoomen dennisdoomen force-pushed the refactor/cleanup-editor-config branch from 83fda36 to fbc5579 Compare June 27, 2025 07:51
Copy link
Member

@jnyrup jnyrup left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good changes!

I often look in analyzer suggestions and it's now flooded with suggestions that are currently disabled.
Could we keep those disabled if we don't care about them?

AV1551
AV1706
AV2305
SA1615
SA1623

@dennisdoomen dennisdoomen requested a review from jnyrup June 27, 2025 20:14
@dennisdoomen dennisdoomen force-pushed the refactor/cleanup-editor-config branch 2 times, most recently from bb204da to cb7f318 Compare June 29, 2025 10:34
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants