Description

When doing #2399 I found that these four methods in TypeAssertions are not guarded against being wrapped in an AssertionScope.

• HaveExplicitProperty
• NotHaveExplicitProperty
• HaveExplicitMethod
• NotHaveExplicitMethod

See how we call Should().Implement() and the make the next assertion without any guards.

Reproduction Steps

var act = () =>
{
    using var _ = new AssertionScope();
    typeof(int).Should().HaveExplicitProperty(typeof(IExplicitInterface), "Foo");
};

act.Should().Throw<XunitException>()
    .WithMessage("Expected type System.Int32 to*implement IExplicitInterface.Foo, but it does not.");

Expected behavior

pass

Actual behavior

Expected exception message to match the equivalent of "Expected type System.Int32 to*implement IExplicitInterface.Foo, but it does not.", but "Expected type System.Int32 to implement interface FluentAssertions.Specs.Types.IExplicitInterface, but it does not.
Expected System.Int32 to explicitly implement FluentAssertions.Specs.Types.IExplicitInterface.Foo, but it does not.
" does not.

Regression?

No response

Known Workarounds

No response

Configuration

No response

Other information

No response

Are you willing to help with a pull-request?

Yes, please assign this issue to me.