Skip to content

feat(service): add bareos-director bareos-filedaemon bareos-storage#1009

Merged
erig0 merged 1 commit intofirewalld:masterfrom
bruno-at-bareos:add-bareos-firewalld-services
Aug 26, 2022
Merged

feat(service): add bareos-director bareos-filedaemon bareos-storage#1009
erig0 merged 1 commit intofirewalld:masterfrom
bruno-at-bareos:add-bareos-firewalld-services

Conversation

@bruno-at-bareos
Copy link
Contributor

  • Add bareos-director (bareos-dir) service definition for default port 9101.
  • Add bareos-filedaemon (bareos-fd) service definition for default port 9102.
  • Add bareos-storage (bareos-sd) service definition for default port 9103.

Signed-off-by: Bruno Friedmann bruno.friedmann@bareos.com

- Add bareos-director (bareos-dir) service definition for default port 9101.
- Add bareos-filedaemon (bareos-fd) service definition for default port 9102.
- Add bareos-storage (bareos-sd) service definition for default port 9103.

Signed-off-by: Bruno Friedmann <bruno.friedmann@bareos.com>
@erig0
Copy link
Collaborator

erig0 commented Aug 26, 2022

Hi Bruno,

I just want to double confirm that you want firewalld to ship these service definitions. Some projects prefer to ship the definitions as part of their package. That may make it easier to manage version differences, avoid package conflicts, etc. See #1002 (and #552) for one such case.

I'm more than happy to take these though. Just let me know.

@erig0 erig0 added the blocked Blocked in some way. e.g. waiting on the user that opened the issue or pull request label Aug 26, 2022
Copy link
Collaborator

@erig0 erig0 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm. Just waiting on confirmation.

@bruno-at-bareos
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hello @erig0 yes the protocol will not change, nor the port, and we have reviewed together the name, description etc before submitting here. And if something has to be corrected, then we will do another Pr ;-)

Thanks for taking care of the PR so quickly. I hope everything was ok.

@erig0
Copy link
Collaborator

erig0 commented Aug 26, 2022

Hello @erig0 yes the protocol will not change, nor the port, and we have reviewed together the name, description etc before submitting here. And if something has to be corrected, then we will do another Pr ;-)

Awesome! Thanks.

Thanks for taking care of the PR so quickly. I hope everything was ok.

Perfect. :)

@erig0 erig0 merged commit 7552095 into firewalld:master Aug 26, 2022
@erig0 erig0 removed the blocked Blocked in some way. e.g. waiting on the user that opened the issue or pull request label Aug 29, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants