Skip to content

Conversation

@Fdawgs
Copy link
Member

@Fdawgs Fdawgs commented Mar 20, 2025

After what has been happening with tj-actions/changed-files over the past week this is probably a sensible idea.

@RafaelGSS even wrote about it a while back!

Checklist

@Fdawgs Fdawgs marked this pull request as ready for review March 20, 2025 18:55
Copy link
Member

@RafaelGSS RafaelGSS left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

FWIW dependabot and renovatebot automatically update those dependencies in the same way as git tags.

@Fdawgs
Copy link
Member Author

Fdawgs commented Mar 21, 2025

FWIW dependabot and renovatebot automatically update those dependencies in the same way as git tags.

That's fine as this repo doesn't automerge dependabot updates, so someone will now need to manually review and merge, adding an extra layer of security. :)

Copy link
Member

@mcollina mcollina left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@Fdawgs Fdawgs requested review from gurgunday and jsumners March 30, 2025 08:20
Copy link
Member

@gurgunday gurgunday left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm if @jsumners is convinced, I feel like this trades convenience for security

@jsumners
Copy link
Member

I am not blocking this. But I am having a hard time understanding the difference between using tags for GitHub maintained actions and letting Dependabot update the hashes automatically.

@Fdawgs Fdawgs merged commit 8fa2741 into main Apr 2, 2025
1 check passed
@Fdawgs Fdawgs deleted the build/actions branch April 2, 2025 07:26
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants