Skip to content

chore(cmake): bump the container plugin version to 0.6.0#2780

Merged
poiana merged 1 commit intofalcosecurity:masterfrom
irozzo-1A:bump-container-plugin
Jan 14, 2026
Merged

chore(cmake): bump the container plugin version to 0.6.0#2780
poiana merged 1 commit intofalcosecurity:masterfrom
irozzo-1A:bump-container-plugin

Conversation

@irozzo-1A
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@irozzo-1A irozzo-1A commented Jan 14, 2026

What type of PR is this?

Uncomment one (or more) /kind <> lines:

/kind bug

/kind cleanup

/kind design

/kind documentation

/kind failing-test

/kind test

/kind feature

/kind sync

Any specific area of the project related to this PR?

Uncomment one (or more) /area <> lines:

/area API-version

/area build

/area CI

/area driver-kmod

/area driver-bpf

/area driver-modern-bpf

/area libscap-engine-bpf

/area libscap-engine-gvisor

/area libscap-engine-kmod

/area libscap-engine-modern-bpf

/area libscap-engine-nodriver

/area libscap-engine-noop

/area libscap-engine-source-plugin

/area libscap-engine-savefile

/area libscap

/area libpman

/area libsinsp

/area tests

/area proposals

Does this PR require a change in the driver versions?

/version driver-API-version-major

/version driver-API-version-minor

/version driver-API-version-patch

/version driver-SCHEMA-version-major

/version driver-SCHEMA-version-minor

/version driver-SCHEMA-version-patch

What this PR does / why we need it:

Bump container plugin version to version 0.6

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Fixes #

Special notes for your reviewer:

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?:

NONE

@poiana poiana added release-note-none kind/sync PRs syncing branch with changes coming from another branch dco-signoff: yes area/build labels Jan 14, 2026
@poiana poiana requested review from hbrueckner and terror96 January 14, 2026 08:59
@poiana poiana added the size/XS label Jan 14, 2026
@ekoops ekoops added this to the 0.23.1 milestone Jan 14, 2026
@codecov
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codecov bot commented Jan 14, 2026 •
edited
Loading

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 74.53%. Comparing base (b50d577) to head (96c8404).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files 
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #2780   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   74.53%   74.53%           
=======================================
  Files         292      292           
  Lines       29995    29995           
  Branches     4654     4654           
=======================================
  Hits        22356    22356           
  Misses       7639     7639
Flag Coverage Δ
libsinsp 74.53% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@irozzo-1A
chore(cmake): bump the container plugin version to 0.6.0
96c8404 
Signed-off-by: irozzo-1A <iacopo@sysdig.com>
@irozzo-1A irozzo-1A force-pushed the bump-container-plugin branch from d87ca2d to 96c8404 Compare January 14, 2026 09:19
@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown

github-actions bot commented Jan 14, 2026

Perf diff from master - unit tests

    11.44%     -1.42%  [.] std::_Sp_counted_base<(__gnu_cxx::_Lock_policy)2>::_M_add_ref_lock_nothrow()
    13.05%     +0.82%  [.] std::__shared_count<(__gnu_cxx::_Lock_policy)2>::_M_get_use_count() const
     9.18%     +0.81%  [.] std::_Sp_counted_base<(__gnu_cxx::_Lock_policy)2>::_M_release()
     7.83%     +0.81%  [.] sinsp_threadinfo::get_fd_table()
    15.17%     -0.61%  [.] std::__shared_ptr<sinsp_threadinfo, (__gnu_cxx::_Lock_policy)2>::__shared_ptr(std::__weak_ptr<sinsp_threadinfo, (__gnu_cxx::_Lock_policy)2> const&, std::nothrow_t)
     9.57%     -0.46%  [.] sinsp_threadinfo::update_main_fdtable()
     6.43%     -0.24%  [.] std::__shared_count<(__gnu_cxx::_Lock_policy)2>::__shared_count(std::__weak_count<(__gnu_cxx::_Lock_policy)2> const&, std::nothrow_t)
     4.88%     +0.21%  [.] thread_group_info::get_first_thread() const
     0.21%     -0.13%  [.] std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >::basic_string<std::allocator<char> >(char const*, std::allocator<char> const&)
     0.07%     +0.11%  [.] std::__detail::_Hashtable_alloc<std::allocator<std::__detail::_Hash_node<std::pair<std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > const, libsinsp::state::dynamic_struct::field_info>, true> > >::_M_deallocate_nodes(std::__detail::_Hash_node<std::pair<std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > const, libsinsp::state::dynamic_struct::field_info>, true>*)

Heap diff from master - unit tests

peak heap memory consumption: 0B
peak RSS (including heaptrack overhead): 0B
total memory leaked: 0B

Heap diff from master - scap file

peak heap memory consumption: 0B
peak RSS (including heaptrack overhead): 0B
total memory leaked: 0B

Benchmarks diff from master

Comparing gbench_data.json to /root/actions-runner/_work/libs/libs/build/gbench_data.json
Benchmark                                                         Time             CPU      Time Old      Time New       CPU Old       CPU New
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BM_sinsp_split_mean                                            +0.0442         +0.0441           238           248           238           248
BM_sinsp_split_median                                          +0.0523         +0.0522           237           250           237           250
BM_sinsp_split_stddev                                          +1.5058         +1.5849             2             4             2             4
BM_sinsp_split_cv                                              +1.3997         +1.4757             0             0             0             0
BM_sinsp_concatenate_paths_relative_path_mean                  -0.0579         -0.0580            74            69            74            69
BM_sinsp_concatenate_paths_relative_path_median                -0.0596         -0.0596            73            69            73            69
BM_sinsp_concatenate_paths_relative_path_stddev                +1.2639         +1.2705             0             1             0             1
BM_sinsp_concatenate_paths_relative_path_cv                    +1.4029         +1.4102             0             0             0             0
BM_sinsp_concatenate_paths_empty_path_mean                     -0.0350         -0.0351            42            41            42            41
BM_sinsp_concatenate_paths_empty_path_median                   -0.0550         -0.0550            42            40            42            40
BM_sinsp_concatenate_paths_empty_path_stddev                  +65.2072        +78.0292             0             1             0             1
BM_sinsp_concatenate_paths_empty_path_cv                      +67.6110        +80.9041             0             0             0             0
BM_sinsp_concatenate_paths_absolute_path_mean                  -0.0713         -0.0713            74            68            74            68
BM_sinsp_concatenate_paths_absolute_path_median                -0.0721         -0.0721            73            68            73            68
BM_sinsp_concatenate_paths_absolute_path_stddev                -0.5722         -0.5765             1             0             1             0
BM_sinsp_concatenate_paths_absolute_path_cv                    -0.5393         -0.5439             0             0             0             0

ekoops
ekoops approved these changes Jan 14, 2026
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@ekoops ekoops left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/approve

@poiana poiana added the lgtm label Jan 14, 2026
@poiana
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

poiana commented Jan 14, 2026

LGTM label has been added.

DetailsGit tree hash: a2ade4173f7b3bd63ecf05cfb54b529961c506f4

@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from Todo to In progress in Falco Roadmap Jan 14, 2026
@poiana
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

poiana commented Jan 14, 2026

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: ekoops, irozzo-1A, leogr

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@poiana poiana merged commit 2d2fb23 into falcosecurity:master Jan 14, 2026
47 checks passed
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from In progress to Done in Falco Roadmap Jan 14, 2026
@ekoops ekoops mentioned this pull request Jan 14, 2026
Merged
@BrewTestBot BrewTestBot mentioned this pull request Jan 14, 2026
Merged
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@leogr leogr leogr approved these changes

@ekoops ekoops ekoops approved these changes

@hbrueckner hbrueckner Awaiting requested review from hbrueckner

@terror96 terror96 Awaiting requested review from terror96

Assignees

@leogr leogr

@ekoops ekoops

Labels

approved area/build dco-signoff: yes kind/sync PRs syncing branch with changes coming from another branch lgtm release-note-none size/XS

Projects

Falco Roadmap
Status: Done

Milestone

0.23.1

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@irozzo-1A @poiana @leogr @ekoops