Update Exampe stylesheet#1626
Merged
nearestnabors merged 2 commits intofacebook:masterfrom Feb 24, 2020
Merged
Conversation
Closed
|
Deploy preview for react-native ready! Built with commit 30cf09e https://deploy-preview-1626--react-native.netlify.com Changes to Thank you for your contributions. |
ecreeth
reviewed
Feb 11, 2020
docs/stylesheet.md
Outdated
| --- | ||
| id: stylesheet | ||
| title: StyleSheet | ||
| original_id: stylesheet |
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The page cannot be referenced. I think this should be id: stylesheet and move it up
9736458 to
98b24e9
Compare
nearestnabors
approved these changes
Feb 24, 2020
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.

I have a suggestion to make, both
absoluteFillandabsoluteFillObjectdo the same thing. Do you still think it necessary to keep this in the documentation?Can't we force any of them to become obsolete?
Does it make sense to have two methods that do the same thing?
#1579