Skip to content

Conversation

@csegarragonz
Copy link
Collaborator

Thus far, we tagged executors with the (user, function) pair. This is needed in multi-threaded environments, where different threads must share the same executor. However, using only the (user, function) pair prevents the execution concurrent applications with the same pair.

Instead, the correct thing to do is to track applications using the (user, function) pair in conjunction with the application id.

Thus far, we tagged executors with the (user, function) pair. This is
needed in multi-threaded environments, where different threads must
share the same executor. However, using only the (user, function) pair
prevents the execution concurrent applications with the same pair.

Instead, the correct thing to do is to track applications using the
(user, function) pair in conjunction with the application id.
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented May 6, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 81.33%. Comparing base (ddba013) to head (c228c0f).

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #434   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   81.33%   81.33%           
=======================================
  Files         117      117           
  Lines        8233     8233           
=======================================
  Hits         6696     6696           
  Misses       1537     1537           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@csegarragonz csegarragonz merged commit 8b5bd8e into main May 6, 2024
@csegarragonz csegarragonz deleted the exec-app branch May 6, 2024 21:36
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants