minor fix (?) in quadrotor example#137
Merged
sshin23 merged 1 commit intoexanauts:mainfrom May 17, 2025
Merged
Conversation
2 tasks
Collaborator
|
Thank you, @jbcaillau for reporting this |
Collaborator
Author
Looks Good To Me? Let’s Get To Merge… 🙂? |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
hi @sshin23 just to fix what looks like a (very) minor issue as
dtshouldT/N(or1/N, depending in any case onNas, otherwise, changing the grid size implies changing the time horizon)BTW: the mayer term in the cost is a bit strange (just looks like the reweighted final grid point of the Lagrange quadrature, but for the control):
do you have a detailed ref. towards the problem?
cc: @amontoison