Replies: 2 comments
-
|
好像现在已经重构过了,但是我的体验目前Dashboard的用处好像是比较类似于TUI的影子,但是我有一些比较不成熟的建议和想法,脱胎于我的工作实践 现况
现在个人开发存在的问题
Dashboard的适配之处Dashboard我认为其实不应该作为一个TUI的影子,反而应该发挥WebSite的优势,他可以发挥图形化的妙用,帮助开发者从一个更高的层面去审视问题,当然,也可以作为一个打开多个reasonix线程,或者和一个总管多个reasonix线程的主线程一起,分配工作,规划节奏的一个控制台,就类似于cursor的agent页面,或者是zcode之类的,尽可能的相信模型的工作,不很关心模型具体做了什么,只关心结果 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
|
我在使用vscode remotessh进行远程开发,此时使用转发的网页dashboard存在这样一个问题:review模式下对文件的修改审阅和确认需要回到远程终端,而不能在dashboard审阅,这应该是一个bug,希望能尽快修改 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
The current dashboard at
dashboard/app.js(~4768 lines, Preact, no build step) grew organically without a central design. Before we integrate it into a proper component framework, we want feedback on the design anchor mockup:→
design/agent-dashboard.html(merging in #19) — drag into your browser; static HTML, no JS framework, ~3300 lines.What we want input on:
Positioning — the mockup positions the dashboard as a companion to the TUI, not a replacement. Chat is first-class (because the TUI has rendering issues on legacy PowerShell), but the dashboard owns long-form reading / charts / multi-file editing / inventory browsing. Right framing? Or should the dashboard be primary?
Sidebar grouping — 14 panels grouped (workspace · observe · configure). Too many? Wrong groupings? What would you cut?
Chat panel — full composer, command palette (
⌘K), approval modal mirrored from the TUI, slash popover anchored to the composer. What pattern would you have used instead?Overview cockpit — 4 KPIs + current session + cost trend + recent plans + tool feed + system health. Which number do you actually look at first?
Inventories pattern (Tools / MCP / Skills / Memory / Permissions) — one filter+table+detail-drawer for all five. Right unification or premature abstraction?
Charts — stacked area for cost-by-source, donut for share, sparklines on KPIs. Helpful or just visual noise?
Editor panel — file tree + tabs + CodeMirror; "see what the agent is about to do" framing, NOT a VS Code replacement. Right scope?
Anything in the mockup you would cut entirely.
Stuff already on the maintainer's mind that would override design polish:
insertBeforereconciler crash; needs root-cause before redesign reaches codeNot all feedback ships, but everything will be read. Replies in English or 中文 都行.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions