Conversation
Signed-off-by: Arko Dasgupta <arko@tetrate.io>
|
ptal @danehans @LukeShu @AliceProxy @Xunzhuo @skriss @youngnick |
docs/latest/design/roadmap.md
Outdated
| - Support extended Gateway API fields. | ||
| - Support experimental Gateway APIs such as TCPRoute [Issue #643][643], UDPRoute [Issue #641][641] and GRPCRoute [Issue #642][642]. | ||
| - Rate Limiting [Issue #670][670]. | ||
| - Authentication [Issue #336][336]. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
IMHO this is overpromising. I would like to understand which maintainers will support these features. We should not depend on the community to deliver roadmap features. I'm in the process of updating #336, but this only covers the AuthN design. From recent feedback (#675 #677) and past experience, the AuthN design alone will take time. Since AuthN is laying the foundation for our approach to Gateway API extensions, this may cause a delay in starting #670. What was the conclusion for delaying RL for RLQS?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@danehans I assigned #670 to myself, I can design many aspects of it while waiting on the extension decision.
reg RLQS
- we dont have any info on when it will release
- will it be a better fit than Envoy's native RLS for the Gateway case ?
- will it be more stable ?
so will start the initial design with Envoy RLS, and can raise a follow up issue to consider moving to RLQS when we
have enough data to answer above questions
| ### [v0.4.0][v0.4.0]: Manageability and Scale | ||
| ### [v0.4.0][v0.4.0]: More Advanced Features through Extension Mechanisms | ||
|
|
||
| - Allow users to configure xDS Resources [Issue #24][24]. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I suggest moving some of the v0.3 deliverables to v0.4. Note that the original v0.3 deliverables were based on a 6-month release cycle.
skriss
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
one suggestion, but LGTM overall
Signed-off-by: Arko Dasgupta <arko@tetrate.io>
e824506
Signed-off-by: Arko Dasgupta <arko@tetrate.io>
|
Codecov upload failure, rerunning CI. |
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #695 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 63.59% 63.14% -0.46%
==========================================
Files 47 47
Lines 5749 5806 +57
==========================================
+ Hits 3656 3666 +10
- Misses 1867 1909 +42
- Partials 226 231 +5
Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here. |
danehans
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Since a majority of maintainers have approved, I will not block. I am concerned that we are overcommitted for v0.3 but we can update the roadmap if needed.
Signed-off-by: Arko Dasgupta arko@tetrate.io