Skip to content

Mention enhancement of jwt_authn filter (PR#6384)#6473

Closed
larrywest wants to merge 2 commits intoenvoyproxy:masterfrom
larrywest:patch-1
Closed

Mention enhancement of jwt_authn filter (PR#6384)#6473
larrywest wants to merge 2 commits intoenvoyproxy:masterfrom
larrywest:patch-1

Conversation

@larrywest
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@larrywest larrywest commented Apr 3, 2019

See Issue #6355

Description: add a line to the version history for PR #6384
Risk Level: zero, for this line of text
Testing: not applicable
Docs Changes: in original PR
Release Notes: yes
Fixes: #6355 (in PR #6384)

See Issue envoyproxy#6355

Signed-off-by: Larry West <Larry_West@intuit.com>
first token must be alphabetic, no "/".

Signed-off-by: Larry West <Larry_West@intuit.com>
* http: added :ref:`max request headers size <envoy_api_field_config.filter.network.http_connection_manager.v2.HttpConnectionManager.max_request_headers_kb>`. The default behaviour is unchanged.
* http: added modifyDecodingBuffer/modifyEncodingBuffer to allow modifying the buffered request/response data.
* http: added encodeComplete/decodeComplete. These are invoked at the end of the stream, after all data has been encoded/decoded respectively. Default implementation is a no-op.
* http: make jwt_authn parsing of JWT more flexible, allowing syntax like ``jwt=eyJhbGciOiJS...ZFnFIw,extra=7,realm=123``
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

should be starting with jwt_authn:

@lizan
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

lizan commented Apr 3, 2019

Can you add the line in PR #6384 directly?

@lizan lizan closed this Apr 3, 2019
@larrywest
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Yes, done in PR #6384 just now.

@larrywest larrywest deleted the patch-1 branch April 3, 2019 19:53
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants