Skip to content

Conversation

@nitsakh
Copy link
Contributor

@nitsakh nitsakh commented Apr 10, 2019

Description of Change

This PR uses electrons electron-node-v12.x branch which is based on node's v12.x branch.
This is however, not rebased on head of node's v12.x branch yet, but is a few commits behind the v8 7.4 merge in node.
Future PRs will rebase on latest node v12.x commits.

Checklist

Release Notes

Notes: Upgraded to node-12 with v8 7.3

@electron-cation electron-cation bot added the new-pr 🌱 PR opened recently label Apr 10, 2019
// dependency. So to expose the unmodified Node 'fs' functionality here,
// we have to copy both 'fs' *and* 'internal/fs/streams' and modify the
// copies to depend on each other instead of on our asarified 'fs' code.
source['original-fs'].replace("require('internal/fs/streams')", "require('original-fs/streams')")
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The hack has been moved to our node fork due to changes of node's module loader.

@nitsakh nitsakh force-pushed the node-12 branch 2 times, most recently from 4da2333 to 689f9ff Compare April 11, 2019 21:31
@nitsakh nitsakh changed the title [WIP] - Node 12 Upgrade Node 12 Upgrade Apr 11, 2019
@electron-cation electron-cation bot removed the new-pr 🌱 PR opened recently label Apr 11, 2019
@zcbenz zcbenz changed the title Node 12 Upgrade Node 12 Upgrade (5-0-x) Apr 16, 2019
@MarshallOfSound
Copy link
Member

What NMV does this currently include?

cc @nornagon

@nornagon
Copy link
Contributor

@ckerr ckerr merged commit ffd2224 into 5-0-x Apr 16, 2019
@release-clerk
Copy link

release-clerk bot commented Apr 16, 2019

Release Notes Persisted

Upgraded to node-12 with v8 7.3

@ckerr ckerr deleted the node-12 branch April 16, 2019 19:51
Copy link
Member

@MarshallOfSound MarshallOfSound left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@nornagon
Copy link
Contributor

you're totally right, whoops.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants