@zcbenz how much work do you think it would be to create a headless version of atom-shell that could be used as a replacement for phantomjs?
phantomjs is lagging behind more and more from what actual web browsers do today and it would be great to have something more up to date to use for headless testing.
@zcbenz how much work do you think it would be to create a headless version of atom-shell that could be used as a replacement for phantomjs?
phantomjs is lagging behind more and more from what actual web browsers do today and it would be great to have something more up to date to use for headless testing.