Add threat_intel package category#366
Conversation
|
@jsoriano this one says thread intel instead of threat intel, might be a typo? |
Yes 🤦 |
|
@akshay-saraswat even if we merge this, can we have written down somewhere what are the criteria to add a new category? Otherwise I am scared we will end up with some low used ones. |
|
@jlind23 if the criteria for additional categories are published, could you please share There are several security categories that I'd really like to include for more granular categorisation and improved discoverability. We currently have 130+ integrations under the 'Security' category. |
|
@jamiehynds nothing was wrote down so far. I'll bring that up again with @mukeshelastic and @akshay-saraswat. |
|
Thanks @jlind23 - here's some of the security categories I had in mind but can certainly narrow it down: elastic/integrations#1328 |
|
@jamiehynds let's discuss this. We want to introduce a process so that we don't overdo the categories. I'll reach out with a draft proposal for feedback. |
What does this PR do?
Add threat intel category.
Why is it important?
Closes #222
Related issues