Skip to content

[Change Proposal] Stricter validation on fields properties #282

@jsoriano

Description

@jsoriano

We have found that it is pretty common (elastic/integrations#2643) to have typos in fields properties. This can be an important issue because this may create unexpected field mappings, and fixing mappings uses to bring breaking changes.

In #281 I explore the enforcement of stricter validation, but there I found that at least for the example field we would need some trade offs.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

Team:EcosystemLabel for the Packages Ecosystem teamdiscussIssue needs discussion

Type

No type
No fields configured for issues without a type.

Projects

No projects

Milestone

No milestone

Relationships

None yet

Development

No branches or pull requests

Issue actions