Ship packages as zip instead of tar.gz#628
Conversation
|
Opening this as ready for review even though CI will be red on the integration tests. The reason is that Kibana does not support zip at the moment. |
|
Do you think it's feasible to prepare an archiver abstraction and support two modes (zip, tar.gz)? |
|
@mtojek Definitively possible but what would be the advantage of having the abstraction if we only plan to support one? |
|
Last time we also planned to support single one :) In the description you've written that we can't push it until Kibana supports the zip format. With an appropriate abstraction we don't need to wait for this. |
|
I realised, only Kibana can handle both as it is a single entry in the registry output ( As soon as elastic/kibana#76197 is merged I'll trigger CI again to see if it goes green. |
|
The implementation looks good to me, let's wait for the CI to pass all tests. |
|
jenkins, test this |
fa20118 to
01c0391
Compare
01c0391 to
17361a9
Compare
This is a breaking change and first needs changes on the Kibana side. The new registry and the new version of Kibana should be either rolled out in sync or Kibana supports both for a bit. Closes elastic#474
17361a9 to
286be87
Compare
This is a breaking change and first needs changes on the Kibana side. The new registry and the new version of Kibana should be either rolled out in sync or Kibana supports both for a bit.
Closes #474