Skip to content

[9.0] Surface failures from nested rake/shell tasks (backport #17310)#17313

Merged
donoghuc merged 1 commit into9.0from
mergify/bp/9.0/pr-17310
Mar 13, 2025
Merged

[9.0] Surface failures from nested rake/shell tasks (backport #17310)#17313
donoghuc merged 1 commit into9.0from
mergify/bp/9.0/pr-17310

Conversation

@mergify
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@mergify mergify bot commented Mar 13, 2025

Release notes

[rn:skip]

What does this PR do?

Previously when rake would shell out the output would be lost. This made debugging CI logs difficult. This commit updates the stack with improved message surfacing on error.

Why is it important/What is the impact to the user?

N/A

Checklist

  • My code follows the style guidelines of this project
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • [ ] I have made corresponding change to the default configuration files (and/or docker env variables)
  • [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works

Related issues

Logs


This is an automatic backport of pull request #17310 done by [Mergify](https://mergify.com).

Previously when rake would shell out the output would be lost. This
made debugging CI logs difficult. This commit updates the stack with
improved message surfacing on error.

(cherry picked from commit 0d931a5)
@mergify mergify bot added the backport label Mar 13, 2025
@elastic-sonarqube
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Quality Gate passed Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Fixed issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
No data about Coverage
No data about Duplication

See analysis details on SonarQube

@elasticmachine
Copy link
Copy Markdown

💚 Build Succeeded

cc @donoghuc

@donoghuc donoghuc merged commit 6ab56e3 into 9.0 Mar 13, 2025
7 checks passed
@donoghuc donoghuc deleted the mergify/bp/9.0/pr-17310 branch March 13, 2025 23:47
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants