Skip to content

Revert "Bugfix for BufferedTokenizer"#16715

Merged
donoghuc merged 1 commit intoelastic:mainfrom
donoghuc:revert-buffered-tokenizer-main
Nov 21, 2024
Merged

Revert "Bugfix for BufferedTokenizer"#16715
donoghuc merged 1 commit intoelastic:mainfrom
donoghuc:revert-buffered-tokenizer-main

Conversation

@donoghuc
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Release notes

What does this PR do?

Reverts #16482, as applied to main

Why is it important/What is the impact to the user?

Strings handled by the buffered tokenizer could be double-encoded, presenting problems.

Checklist

  • My code follows the style guidelines of this project
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • I have made corresponding change to the default configuration files (and/or docker env variables)
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works

Author's Checklist

  • [ ]

How to test this PR locally

Related issues

Use cases

Screenshots

Logs

…ase of lines bigger then sizeLimit (elastic#16482)"

This reverts commit 85493ce.
@donoghuc donoghuc changed the title Revert "Bugfix for BufferedTokenizer to completely consume lines in c… Revert "Bugfix for BufferedTokenizer" Nov 21, 2024
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@jsvd jsvd left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, please merge once CI is green.

@elastic-sonarqube
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Quality Gate passed Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Fixed issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
No data about Coverage
No data about Duplication

See analysis details on SonarQube

@elasticmachine
Copy link
Copy Markdown

💚 Build Succeeded

@donoghuc donoghuc merged commit eb7e125 into elastic:main Nov 21, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants