Skip to content

[5.x] move tile map visualization out of vislib#9639

Merged
thomasneirynck merged 1 commit into5.xfrom
jasper/backport/9441/5.x
Dec 26, 2016
Merged

[5.x] move tile map visualization out of vislib#9639
thomasneirynck merged 1 commit into5.xfrom
jasper/backport/9441/5.x

Conversation

@elastic-jasper
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

move tile map visualization out of vislib

Backports PR #9441

Commit 1:
moving colors and tooltips out of vislib to vis

Commit 2:
moving tile map vis out of vislib

Commit 3:
rebasing on master and fixing linting

@elastic-jasper elastic-jasper added backport This PR is a backport of another PR has conflicts labels Dec 26, 2016
Backports PR #9441

**Commit 1:**
moving colors and tooltips out of vislib to vis

* Original sha: fd1bc58
* Authored by ppisljar <peter.pisljar@gmail.com> on 2016-12-13T12:40:08Z

**Commit 2:**
moving tile map vis out of vislib

* Original sha: 126f1de
* Authored by ppisljar <peter.pisljar@gmail.com> on 2016-12-13T12:40:49Z

**Commit 3:**
rebasing on master and fixing linting

* Original sha: c665d4c
* Authored by ppisljar <peter.pisljar@gmail.com> on 2016-12-14T09:51:18Z
@ppisljar ppisljar force-pushed the jasper/backport/9441/5.x branch from 32773fb to 418f67a Compare December 26, 2016 14:27
@thomasneirynck thomasneirynck self-assigned this Dec 26, 2016
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@thomasneirynck thomasneirynck left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

tested this backport, and it works as expected.

@thomasneirynck
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

thomasneirynck commented Dec 26, 2016

going ahead and merging. failing CLA check is due to broken validation service.

@thomasneirynck thomasneirynck merged commit 8e76bd8 into 5.x Dec 26, 2016
@ppisljar ppisljar deleted the jasper/backport/9441/5.x branch December 26, 2016 18:22
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

backport This PR is a backport of another PR

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants