Skip to content

[8.19] [Security Solution] Unskip Related Integrations Cypress test (#239532)#239926

Merged
nikitaindik merged 1 commit intoelastic:8.19from
nikitaindik:backport/8.19/pr-239532
Oct 22, 2025
Merged

[8.19] [Security Solution] Unskip Related Integrations Cypress test (#239532)#239926
nikitaindik merged 1 commit intoelastic:8.19from
nikitaindik:backport/8.19/pr-239532

Conversation

@nikitaindik
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@nikitaindik nikitaindik commented Oct 21, 2025

ℹ️ The diff appears large, but the only functional change is the removal of .only. The rest comes from Prettier formatting.

Backport

This will backport the following commits from main to 8.19:

Questions ?

Please refer to the Backport tool documentation

…#239532)

**Resolves: elastic#239356

🟢 Flaky test runner:
https://buildkite.com/elastic/kibana-flaky-test-suite-runner/builds/9560

# Summary
This PR unskips the Related Integrations Cypress tests. The tests were
previously failing because one of the Fleet packages they depend on
contained a YAML syntax error. That issue has now been fixed
([PR](elastic/integrations#15669)), so the tests
can be safely re-enabled.

The diff appears large, but the only functional change is the removal of
`.only`. The rest comes from Prettier formatting.

(cherry picked from commit 1bfd3c1)

# Conflicts:
#	x-pack/solutions/security/test/security_solution_cypress/cypress/e2e/detection_response/rule_management/related_integrations/related_integrations.cy.ts
@nikitaindik nikitaindik added the backport This PR is a backport of another PR label Oct 21, 2025
@nikitaindik nikitaindik enabled auto-merge (squash) October 21, 2025 14:32
@elasticmachine
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

💚 Build Succeeded

Metrics [docs]

✅ unchanged

@nikitaindik nikitaindik merged commit 00b718e into elastic:8.19 Oct 22, 2025
11 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

backport This PR is a backport of another PR

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants