Merged
Conversation
Contributor
Author
|
/ci |
Contributor
Author
|
@elasticmachine merge upstream |
Contributor
Author
|
/ci |
Contributor
Author
|
/ci |
Contributor
Author
|
@elasticmachine merge upstream |
Contributor
Author
|
@elasticmachine merge upstream |
Heenawter
reviewed
Aug 1, 2024
...resentation/presentation_containers/interfaces/unsaved_changes/initialize_unsaved_changes.ts
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...resentation/presentation_containers/interfaces/unsaved_changes/initialize_unsaved_changes.ts
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...controls_example/public/react_controls/timeslider_control/get_timeslider_control_factory.tsx
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...ls_example/public/react_controls/data_controls/search_control/get_search_control_factory.tsx
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Heenawter
reviewed
Aug 1, 2024
...xample/public/react_controls/data_controls/range_slider/get_range_slider_control_factory.tsx
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
💛 Build succeeded, but was flaky
Failed CI StepsMetrics [docs]Module Count
Public APIs missing comments
Async chunks
Page load bundle
Unknown metric groupsAPI count
History
To update your PR or re-run it, just comment with: cc @nreese |
davismcphee
approved these changes
Aug 2, 2024
This was referenced Aug 2, 2024
Heenawter
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 12, 2024
Closes #190066 ## Summary In #189128 (comment), I suggested adding a `skip` to the comparators subscription in order to prevent `unsavedChanges` from emitting twice - however, while I was on the right track with this suggestion, I didn't look closely enough at how this worked. Essentially, this is how it worked without the skip when creating a brand new React embeddable: 1. We initialize `unsavedChanges` by calling `runComparators` to get its initial value - since it is a new embeddable and therefore **does not have** unsaved state, it returns the entire state per the early return in `runComparators` 2. The comparator subjects all emit and, after the debounce, `unsavedChanges` gets set **again** by calling `runComparators` - similarly, it returns the entire state due to the early return. 3. Unsaved changes emits twice unnecessarily - once at initialization, once after a debounce 🔥 By adding the `skip` where I suggested, this is what happened: 1. We initialize `unsavedChanges` by calling `runComparators` to get its initial value - it returns the entire state due to the early return. 2. We **ignore** the first emit of every comparator due to the `skip` - this is good, because unsaved changes emits only once! 3. But, when we go to save the dashboard, the placement of the `skip` made it so that the subscription **did not fire** when `lastSavedState` emits - it is waiting for the comparators to emit again before firing! So, the unsaved changes remains unnecessarily 🔥 Essentially, we want to `skip` the first emit of the **whole** `comparator` + `lastSavedState` observable that results from the `pipe` - **not** just the comparators. Otherwise, we don't get to the `combineLatestWith` until **after** the comparators emit a second time, which means we don't respond when`lastSavedState` emits after a React embeddable panel is freshly added. By rearranging the order of operations in the `pipe`, we achieve the desired behaviour. To test the above, move the `skip` to **before** the `lastSavedState` emit. Add a React embeddable panel, and try to save - unsaved changes will be stuck. On a fresh dashboard, add a React embeddable panel again, **edit** that React embeddable to trigger a comparator emit, **then** save - unsaved changes is cleared! ### Checklist - [x] [Unit or functional tests](https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/kibana/master/development-tests.html) were updated or added to match the most common scenarios ### For maintainers - [ ] This was checked for breaking API changes and was [labeled appropriately](https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/kibana/master/contributing.html#kibana-release-notes-process)
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.