Skip to content

[nagios_xi] 3046: ECS Schema adherence for Nagios-XI fields#3197

Merged
ishleenk17 merged 2 commits intoelastic:mainfrom
ishleenk17:nagios_fix_3046
Apr 27, 2022
Merged

[nagios_xi] 3046: ECS Schema adherence for Nagios-XI fields#3197
ishleenk17 merged 2 commits intoelastic:mainfrom
ishleenk17:nagios_fix_3046

Conversation

@ishleenk17
Copy link
Member

What does this PR do?

Checklist

  • I have reviewed tips for building integrations and this pull request is aligned with them.
  • I have verified that all data streams collect metrics or logs.
  • I have added an entry to my package's changelog.yml file.
  • I have verified that Kibana version constraints are current according to guidelines.

How to test this PR locally

elastic-package test system -v -g
elastic-package test static -v -g

Related issues

@ishleenk17 ishleenk17 requested a review from a team as a code owner April 26, 2022 12:20
@cla-checker-service
Copy link

cla-checker-service bot commented Apr 26, 2022

💚 CLA has been signed

@elasticmachine
Copy link

elasticmachine commented Apr 26, 2022

💚 Build Succeeded

the below badges are clickable and redirect to their specific view in the CI or DOCS
Pipeline View Test View Changes Artifacts preview preview

Expand to view the summary

Build stats

  • Start Time: 2022-04-27T06:22:23.467+0000

  • Duration: 14 min 7 sec

Test stats 🧪

Test Results
Failed 0
Passed 10
Skipped 0
Total 10

🤖 GitHub comments

To re-run your PR in the CI, just comment with:

  • /test : Re-trigger the build.

@elasticmachine
Copy link

elasticmachine commented Apr 26, 2022

🌐 Coverage report

Name Metrics % (covered/total) Diff
Packages 100.0% (2/2) 💚
Files 100.0% (2/2) 💚 2.918
Classes 100.0% (2/2) 💚 2.918
Methods 95.652% (22/23) 👍 6.942
Lines 96.881% (497/513) 👍 6.94
Conditionals 100.0% (0/0) 💚

@mtojek mtojek requested a review from kush-elastic April 26, 2022 12:52
Copy link
Contributor

@kush-elastic kush-elastic left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can you update the PR Heading: [nagios_xi] 3046: ECS Schema adherence for Nagios-XI fields
Else LGTM!

@ishleenk17 ishleenk17 changed the title 3046: ECS Schema adherence for Nagios-XE fields [nagios_xi] 3046: ECS Schema adherence for Nagios-XE fields Apr 26, 2022
@kush-elastic
Copy link
Contributor

/test

1 similar comment
@ishleenk17
Copy link
Member Author

/test

@jsoriano
Copy link
Member

The problem with CLA seems to be caused by the use of local emails in the commits. @ishleenk17 could you please replace these emails in these commits? With an email for what the CLA is valid.

Copy link
Member

@jsoriano jsoriano left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Codewise LGTM, there is some issue with CLA.

@ishleenk17
Copy link
Member Author

/test

@kush-elastic kush-elastic self-requested a review April 27, 2022 04:55
Copy link
Contributor

@kush-elastic kush-elastic left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

@kush-elastic kush-elastic changed the title [nagios_xi] 3046: ECS Schema adherence for Nagios-XE fields [nagios_xi] 3046: ECS Schema adherence for Nagios-XI fields Apr 27, 2022
@ishleenk17 ishleenk17 merged commit bde7b24 into elastic:main Apr 27, 2022
@ishleenk17 ishleenk17 deleted the nagios_fix_3046 branch May 26, 2022 08:25
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

nagios_xi using invalid field values according to ECS

6 participants