Skip to content

[8.19] [Failure store] Add data stream options (#4414)#5807

Merged
pquentin merged 1 commit into8.19from
backport/8.19/pr-4414
Dec 9, 2025
Merged

[8.19] [Failure store] Add data stream options (#4414)#5807
pquentin merged 1 commit into8.19from
backport/8.19/pr-4414

Conversation

@pquentin
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@pquentin pquentin commented Dec 9, 2025

Backport

This will backport the following commits from main to 8.19:

Questions ?

Please refer to the Backport tool documentation

(cherry picked from commit 00be10a)

# Conflicts:
#	output/openapi/elasticsearch-openapi.json
#	output/openapi/elasticsearch-serverless-openapi.json
#	output/schema/schema.json
#	output/typescript/types.ts
#	specification/indices/_types/IndexTemplate.ts
@pquentin pquentin requested a review from gmarouli December 9, 2025 06:06
@pquentin pquentin changed the title [8.19] [Failure store] Add data stream options to the es specs (#4414) [8.19] [Failure store] Add data stream options (#4414) Dec 9, 2025
@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Dec 9, 2025

Following you can find the validation changes against the target branch for the APIs.

API Status Request Response
indices.delete_data_stream_options 🟠 → 🟢 Missing type → 1/1 Missing type → 1/1
indices.get_data_stream_options 🟠 → 🟢 Missing type → 9/9 Missing type → 9/9
indices.put_data_stream_options 🟠 → 🟢 Missing type → 2/2 Missing type → 2/2

You can validate these APIs yourself by using the make validate target.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@gmarouli gmarouli left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you @pquentin , I completely missed this :(

@pquentin pquentin merged commit 990f260 into 8.19 Dec 9, 2025
9 checks passed
@pquentin pquentin deleted the backport/8.19/pr-4414 branch December 9, 2025 09:01
@pquentin
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

pquentin commented Dec 9, 2025

No worries! We don’t currently have a good way to track missed backports. We should because the output folder causes a lot of conflicts.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants