Skip Inspecting Busy Indices on ILM CS Application (#78471)#78496
Merged
original-brownbear merged 1 commit intoelastic:7.xfrom Sep 30, 2021
original-brownbear:78471-7.x
Merged
Skip Inspecting Busy Indices on ILM CS Application (#78471)#78496original-brownbear merged 1 commit intoelastic:7.xfrom original-brownbear:78471-7.x
original-brownbear merged 1 commit intoelastic:7.xfrom
original-brownbear:78471-7.x
Conversation
If the current combination of current-step and index has a running CS update task enqueued there is no point in adding yet another task for this combination on the applier and we can skip the expensive inspection for the index. follow up to #78390
Collaborator
|
Pinging @elastic/es-data-management (Team:Data Management) |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
If the current combination of current-step and index has a running CS update task
enqueued there is no point in adding yet another task for this combination on the applier
and we can skip the expensive inspection for the index.
follow up to #78390
backport of #78471