Skip to content

Make ILM Steps use Infinite Master Timeout (#74143)#74622

Merged
original-brownbear merged 1 commit intoelastic:7.xfrom
original-brownbear:74143-7.x
Jun 28, 2021
Merged

Make ILM Steps use Infinite Master Timeout (#74143)#74622
original-brownbear merged 1 commit intoelastic:7.xfrom
original-brownbear:74143-7.x

Conversation

@original-brownbear
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Same as #72085 but for ILM. Having a timeout on these internal "requests"
only adds more noise if master is slow already when timed out steps trigger
moves to the error step.
It seems like it is safe to remove the setting for the timeout outright as well
as it was not used anywhere and never documented as far as I can tell.

backport of #74143 (I'll open a separate PR for adding the deprecation warning + docs)

Same as #72085 but for ILM. Having a timeout on these internal "requests"
only adds more noise if master is slow already when timed out steps trigger
moves to the error step.
It seems like it is safe to remove the setting for the timeout outright as well
as it was not used anywhere and never documented as far as I can tell.
@original-brownbear original-brownbear added :Data Management/ILM+SLM DO NOT USE. Use ":StorageEngine/ILM" or ":Distributed Coordination/SLM" instead. backport labels Jun 28, 2021
@elasticmachine elasticmachine added the Team:Data Management (obsolete) DO NOT USE. This team no longer exists. label Jun 28, 2021
@elasticmachine
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Pinging @elastic/es-core-features (Team:Core/Features)

@original-brownbear original-brownbear merged commit 2b8b7c1 into elastic:7.x Jun 28, 2021
@original-brownbear original-brownbear deleted the 74143-7.x branch June 28, 2021 13:25
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

backport :Data Management/ILM+SLM DO NOT USE. Use ":StorageEngine/ILM" or ":Distributed Coordination/SLM" instead. Team:Data Management (obsolete) DO NOT USE. This team no longer exists.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants