Hi @kuseman

Thanks for the PR. This wouldn't solve one of the big reasons for#2149 as it still includes the took key in the response, which can vary with every request.

We had decided against supporting this option, but have reopened #2149 after your request to do so. We will discuss again and get back to you.

Ah ok, maybe this PL shouldn't be connected to 2149 but rather a new issue.

Hi @kuseman

We're keen to provide a more generic solution which people can bend to their needs. I've opened this issue about it #7401

thanks for sending the PR, but I'm going to close this issue in favour of #7401

Seems legit, good proposal with transform script, like it.