improve painless whitelist coverage of java api#18533
Merged
rmuir merged 2 commits intoelastic:masterfrom May 24, 2016
Merged
Conversation
Contributor
|
LGTM! @rmuir Thank you so much for doing this! We'll have an actual API now. I seriously owe you a case or two of top-shelf beer. |
18 tasks
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This gives us a better foundation. Still TODO is java.time (I need a break), but this is most of the basic stuff.
I also made very minor changes to reduce the ram usage of Definition.INSTANCE: we don't truly need to hang on to stuff from the reflection api (just 'int modifiers').