You can already use the _id field in a term/terms query and it does the right thing, in spite of the fact that the _id field doesn't really exist. It would be nice to do the same thing with _index, instead of having to resort to the indices query.
The _type field does actually exist and is indexed, so adding _index would complete the trinity.
You can already use the
_idfield in aterm/termsquery and it does the right thing, in spite of the fact that the_idfield doesn't really exist. It would be nice to do the same thing with_index, instead of having to resort to theindicesquery.The
_typefield does actually exist and is indexed, so adding_indexwould complete the trinity.