The dots in fieldnames work for 5.0 was for dynamic fields and document parsing. But we still need to add support for specifying dots in fieldnames in mappings apis. This is less troublesome to users as dynamic mappings (where sometimes the source field name cannot be controlled), but still a pain to deal with.
The dots in fieldnames work for 5.0 was for dynamic fields and document parsing. But we still need to add support for specifying dots in fieldnames in mappings apis. This is less troublesome to users as dynamic mappings (where sometimes the source field name cannot be controlled), but still a pain to deal with.