Skip to content

Backport: Make user.group a nesting of the group field set (#308)#355

Merged
webmat merged 1 commit intoelastic:1.0from
webmat:backport_308_1.0
Mar 5, 2019
Merged

Backport: Make user.group a nesting of the group field set (#308)#355
webmat merged 1 commit intoelastic:1.0from
webmat:backport_308_1.0

Conversation

@webmat
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@webmat webmat commented Mar 5, 2019

Cherry-pick of PR #308 to 1.0 branch. Original message:

Breaking change.

Field set name "group" was being used as a leaf field at user.group. It had different semantics as the field set: it was a keyword field, instead of being a nesting of the field set. This goes against a driving principle of ECS, and has been corrected.

We removed the user.group keyword field (introduced in #204), and made the group field set nestable at user.group.

Breaking change.

Field set name "group" was being used as a leaf field at `user.group`. It had different semantics as the field set: it was a keyword field, instead of being a nesting of the field set. This goes against a driving principle of ECS, and has been corrected.

We removed the `user.group` `keyword` field (introduced in elastic#204), and made the `group` field set nestable at `user.group`.
@webmat webmat changed the title Make user.group a nesting of the group field set (#308) Backport: Make user.group a nesting of the group field set (#308) Mar 5, 2019
@webmat webmat self-assigned this Mar 5, 2019
@webmat webmat merged commit ff9428a into elastic:1.0 Mar 5, 2019
@webmat webmat deleted the backport_308_1.0 branch March 7, 2019 12:29
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants