Skip to content

[RFC] Roll back wildcard migration to stage one#1237

Merged
ebeahan merged 3 commits intoelastic:masterfrom
ebeahan:rollback-wildcard-stage-one
Jan 29, 2021
Merged

[RFC] Roll back wildcard migration to stage one#1237
ebeahan merged 3 commits intoelastic:masterfrom
ebeahan:rollback-wildcard-stage-one

Conversation

@ebeahan
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@ebeahan ebeahan commented Jan 27, 2021

Due to performance concerns, the wildcard RFC is being rolled back to stage one.

We'll continue to iterate on the proposal with a focus on performance implications to ensure we can move forward with this important change with the schema as soon as is practical.

@ebeahan ebeahan added the RFC label Jan 27, 2021
@ebeahan ebeahan self-assigned this Jan 27, 2021

<!-- An RFC should link to the PRs for each of it stage advancements. -->

Due to performance concerns brought up during implementation, the wildcard changes were [rolled back](https://github.com/elastic/ecs/pull/1237) to iterate on this proposal with a focus on performance implications. The original round of PRs are listed under `First Phase`, and the PRs following the rollback are grouped under `Second Phase`.
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Added some additional context to this section to help someone navigate the change history.

@ebeahan ebeahan force-pushed the rollback-wildcard-stage-one branch from f8cc599 to 82fe10d Compare January 27, 2021 17:55
epixa
epixa previously approved these changes Jan 29, 2021
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@epixa epixa left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just a date change.

LGTM

Co-authored-by: Court Ewing <court@epixa.com>
@ebeahan ebeahan merged commit 812eb09 into elastic:master Jan 29, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants