Skip to content

Revert "[7.17 backport] Update elastic-agent-client used in 7.17 releases"#39585

Merged
michel-laterman merged 3 commits into7.17from
revert-39224-7.17-update-elastic-agent-client
May 21, 2024
Merged

Revert "[7.17 backport] Update elastic-agent-client used in 7.17 releases"#39585
michel-laterman merged 3 commits into7.17from
revert-39224-7.17-update-elastic-agent-client

Conversation

@michel-laterman
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Reverts #39224

There is an issue with the new version of elastic-agent-client and the local control protocol in pkg/agent/control/proto both using the same name and having and causing a panic when the elastic-agent binary resolves its init functions.

@michel-laterman michel-laterman requested review from a team as code owners May 15, 2024 19:38
@michel-laterman michel-laterman requested review from belimawr, blakerouse and leehinman and removed request for a team May 15, 2024 19:38
@botelastic botelastic bot added the needs_team Indicates that the issue/PR needs a Team:* label label May 15, 2024
@michel-laterman
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@rdner the integration test failure is a much bigger deal then the description implies. I think it's best to revert the agent until it's resolved

@michel-laterman michel-laterman added bug Team:Elastic-Agent Label for the Agent team labels May 15, 2024
@elasticmachine
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Pinging @elastic/elastic-agent (Team:Elastic-Agent)

@botelastic botelastic bot removed the needs_team Indicates that the issue/PR needs a Team:* label label May 15, 2024
@michel-laterman
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

#39586 has the actual fix

@michel-laterman michel-laterman enabled auto-merge (squash) May 16, 2024 22:12
@michel-laterman
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

buildkite test this

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

bug Team:Elastic-Agent Label for the Agent team

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants