Conversation
|
cc: @ruflin |
|
Jenkins standing by to test this. If you aren't a maintainer, you can ignore this comment. Someone with commit access, please review this and clear it for Jenkins to run. |
1 similar comment
|
Jenkins standing by to test this. If you aren't a maintainer, you can ignore this comment. Someone with commit access, please review this and clear it for Jenkins to run. |
8304799 to
639204e
Compare
|
I updated the PR text to add more details on the changes. Some things we should do / check:
|
|
jenkins, test it |
|
jenkins, package it |
|
Just found out where the "new packages" are coming from. |
|
I found all of the above missing / added files and all looks good. From my perspective we need to have the following changes before merging this PR:
I'm ok with leaving in the the updated dependencies for some of the packages as we are in master and we need to update these anyways. @elastic/beats WDYT? |
Of the |
|
@andrewkroh, if tests pass then does it mean that the change is good? I had a passing build until the previous commit. I've pushed a fix again. Build should pass now. |
|
@andrewkroh @vjsamuel I merged it. The great thing about govendor is that it only include |
|
👍 |
Attempting to change go dependency management from glide to govendor.
This PR contains the following changes:
This PR didn't touch the dependencies in the docker module as they have some internal changes.