Cherry-pick #19275 to 7.8: Add librpm.so.9 to the names dlopen searches#19286
Merged
andrewkroh merged 1 commit intoelastic:7.8from Jun 18, 2020
Merged
Cherry-pick #19275 to 7.8: Add librpm.so.9 to the names dlopen searches#19286andrewkroh merged 1 commit intoelastic:7.8from
andrewkroh merged 1 commit intoelastic:7.8from
Conversation
Fedora 31 and 32 use librpm.so.9, but Auditbeat's system/package dataset doesn't try to load this version of the library. Fixes elastic#19253 (cherry picked from commit 6fedaef)
Contributor
|
Pinging @elastic/siem (Team:SIEM) |
leehinman
approved these changes
Jun 18, 2020
Contributor
leehinman
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
looks like pull number needs to be fixed in Changelog
Contributor
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Cherry-pick of PR #19275 to 7.8 branch. Original message:
What does this PR do?
Fedora 31 and 32 use librpm.so.9, but Auditbeat's system/package dataset doesn't try to load
this version of the library.
Why is it important?
It makes the system/package dataset work on newer Fedora releases.
Checklist
CHANGELOG.next.asciidocorCHANGELOG-developer.next.asciidoc.Related issues