Merged
Conversation
This reverts commit 9e86c9d.
xrmx
approved these changes
Mar 31, 2025
kruskall
suggested changes
Mar 31, 2025
Member
kruskall
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
not all of these are first party action
Member
Author
I see two actions?
I'll pin them in a follow-up. I think the other ones are either coming from |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Reverts #2236
I prefer that we don't pin versions coming from the
actionsfor now.Let's agree on this. At the moment, it requires some manual actions in our end to validate change for something we follow the GH security hardening: