-Issue: #205: Merging (Identically Specified) MinHashLSH objects#232
-Issue: #205: Merging (Identically Specified) MinHashLSH objects#232ekzhu merged 6 commits intoekzhu:masterfrom
Conversation
|
@ekzhu I have raised a PR. I have tried to cover all the points that we had discussed. Please feel free to engage and let me know if any modification is required. Thank you! |
|
@ekzhu Resolved the conversations. Can you please go through the changes. Thank you. Let me know if there are any other changes. |
|
Could you also add "3.12" to the tested python version: https://github.com/ekzhu/datasketch/blob/master/.github/workflows/test.yml#L11 |
|
@ekzhu When will this commit be merged? |
|
@junrae6454 Still waiting for @rupeshkumaar's changes. Unless you want to help finishing this? |
This is also done. |
Thanks. Let me know when the changes are pushed |
|
Please do let me know, @ekzhu about the hashfunc for redis that I have asked. Thank you. Logging out for now. Once this is done I will push the changes. |
|
@ekzhu Please review. |
|
Also, to fix the tests failure for now, remove 3.12 from python version. |
|
Please review @ekzhu |
|
@rupeshkumaar merged, thank you for the hard work!! |
|
@rupeshkumaar if you are interested, you can take a look at this issue #236 that broke the library for python 3.12 |
|
Yeah, sure I will take a look. @ekzhu |
Merging two MinHashLSH of the same length (num_perm).