Skip to content

Dependency Updates#3385

Merged
merks merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
update_target
Oct 5, 2025
Merged

Dependency Updates#3385
merks merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
update_target

Conversation

@eclipse-releng-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

The content of the target eclipse-sdk-prereqs.target was updated

Please review the changes and merge if appropriate, or cherry pick individual updates.

The following maven artifacts have been updated:

  • org.ow2.asm:asm-analysis:jar:9.8 has been updated to version 9.9
    • additionally requires java.package; org.objectweb.asm 9.9.0 compared to the previous version
    • additionally requires java.package; org.objectweb.asm.signature 9.9.0 compared to the previous version
    • additionally requires java.package; org.objectweb.asm.tree 9.9.0 compared to the previous version
  • org.ow2.asm:asm-commons:jar:9.8 has been updated to version 9.9
    • additionally requires java.package; org.objectweb.asm 9.9.0 compared to the previous version
    • additionally requires java.package; org.objectweb.asm.signature 9.9.0 compared to the previous version
    • additionally requires java.package; org.objectweb.asm.tree 9.9.0 compared to the previous version
  • org.ow2.asm:asm-tree:jar:9.8 has been updated to version 9.9
    • additionally requires java.package; org.objectweb.asm 9.9.0 compared to the previous version
    • additionally requires java.package; org.objectweb.asm.signature 9.9.0 compared to the previous version
  • org.ow2.asm:asm-util:jar:9.8 has been updated to version 9.9
    • additionally requires java.package; org.objectweb.asm 9.9.0 compared to the previous version
    • additionally requires java.package; org.objectweb.asm.signature 9.9.0 compared to the previous version
    • additionally requires java.package; org.objectweb.asm.tree 9.9.0 compared to the previous version
    • additionally requires java.package; org.objectweb.asm.tree.analysis 9.9.0 compared to the previous version
  • org.ow2.asm:asm:jar:9.8 has been updated to version 9.9

@merks

merks commented Oct 5, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/request-license-review

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Oct 5, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/request-license-review

License review requests:

After all reviews have concluded, re-run the license-vetting check from the Github Actions web-interface to update its status.

Workflow run (with attached summary files):
https://github.com/eclipse-platform/eclipse.platform.releng.aggregator/actions/runs/18255159344

@merks

merks commented Oct 5, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@iloveeclipse

FYI, this asm update also requires a jacoco update

jacoco/jacoco#1965

[ERROR] Missing requirement: org.jacoco.core 0.8.13.202504020838 requires 'java.package; org.objectweb.asm [9.8.0,9.9.0)' but it could not be found

Is that a reason to delay updating the Platform's target platform or can we proceed here once the iplab issues are resolved?

@merks

merks commented Oct 5, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

FYI, @akurtakov mentioned the need for something like this after the update:

akurtakov/eclipse.jdt.debug@9b68d32

@iloveeclipse

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Is that a reason to delay updating the Platform's target platform or can we proceed here once the iplab issues are resolved?

I believe we can proceed. ASM bundles can be installed in different versions in parallel, jacoco/eclemma should be able to run on older bundles if they can be installed from somewhere. What I believe could be affected is Xtext build, but I assume it would only need a bump in dependencies + manifests updates.

@merks

merks commented Oct 5, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@iloveeclipse

Thanks, FYI, just for clarification, I cannot update Orbit's asm version without a jacoco update, so that update process is stalled until a new version of jacoco becomes available at Maven Central.

@merks merks merged commit 0c62a5d into master Oct 5, 2025
7 of 9 checks passed
@merks merks deleted the update_target branch October 5, 2025 07:42
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants