Skip to content

FLTK 1.3.3 patch for Octave (and maybe others) (REVIEW) #3704

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
boegel merged 1 commit into from
Oct 29, 2016
Merged

FLTK 1.3.3 patch for Octave (and maybe others) (REVIEW) #3704

boegel merged 1 commit into from
Oct 29, 2016

Conversation

@hajgato
Copy link
Collaborator

@hajgato hajgato commented Oct 25, 2016

No description provided.

@hajgato hajgato changed the title FLTK 1.3.3 patch for Octave (and maybe others) FLTK 1.3.3 patch for Octave (and maybe others) (REVIEW) Oct 25, 2016
@hajgato hajgato mentioned this pull request Oct 25, 2016
Merged
@boegel boegel modified the milestone: 3.0 Oct 25, 2016
@boegel
Copy link
Member

boegel commented Oct 28, 2016

lgtm

@boegel
Copy link
Member

boegel commented Oct 28, 2016

Test report by @boegel
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 4 out of 4 (4 easyconfigs in this PR)
node2007.delcatty.os - Linux SL 6.8, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2670 0 @ 2.60GHz, Python 2.6.6
See https://gist.github.com/e31758868235b959b12c78ef4a724b56 for a full test report.

@boegel
Copy link
Member

boegel commented Oct 29, 2016

Test report by @boegel
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 4 out of 4 (4 easyconfigs in this PR)
node2301.phanpy.os - Linux centos linux 7.2.1511, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2680 v3 @ 2.50GHz, Python 2.7.5
See https://gist.github.com/ac08fbaae29e6bb11063f275260a7a0f for a full test report.

@boegel
Copy link
Member

boegel commented Oct 29, 2016

Going in, thanks @hajgato!

@boegel boegel merged commit 045b622 into easybuilders:develop Oct 29, 2016
@hajgato hajgato mentioned this pull request Oct 31, 2016
Merged
@hajgato hajgato deleted the fltk_octave branch June 8, 2017 13:17
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

No reviews

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

3.0

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@hajgato @boegel