Skip to content

Conversation

@WilleBell
Copy link
Contributor

(created using eb --new-pr)

@smoors smoors added the new label May 8, 2024
@smoors
Copy link
Contributor

smoors commented May 8, 2024

@boegelbot: please test @ generoso

@boegelbot
Copy link
Collaborator

@smoors: Request for testing this PR well received on login1

PR test command 'EB_PR=20472 EB_ARGS= EB_CONTAINER= EB_REPO=easybuild-easyconfigs /opt/software/slurm/bin/sbatch --job-name test_PR_20472 --ntasks=4 ~/boegelbot/eb_from_pr_upload_generoso.sh' executed!

  • exit code: 0
  • output:
Submitted batch job 13429

Test results coming soon (I hope)...

Details

- notification for comment with ID 2101031558 processed

Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me,
it is of no use to you (unless you think I have a bug, which I don't).

@boegelbot
Copy link
Collaborator

Test report by @boegelbot
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 1 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in total)
cns1 - Linux Rocky Linux 8.9, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2667 v3 @ 3.20GHz (haswell), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/boegelbot/e744d6bfcedfec56bc730aaf8b4f1746 for a full test report.

Co-authored-by: Sam Moors <smoors@users.noreply.github.com>
@smoors
Copy link
Contributor

smoors commented May 10, 2024

@boegelbot: please test @ generoso

@boegelbot
Copy link
Collaborator

@smoors: Request for testing this PR well received on login1

PR test command 'EB_PR=20472 EB_ARGS= EB_CONTAINER= EB_REPO=easybuild-easyconfigs /opt/software/slurm/bin/sbatch --job-name test_PR_20472 --ntasks=4 ~/boegelbot/eb_from_pr_upload_generoso.sh' executed!

  • exit code: 0
  • output:
Submitted batch job 13439

Test results coming soon (I hope)...

Details

- notification for comment with ID 2104413365 processed

Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me,
it is of no use to you (unless you think I have a bug, which I don't).

@boegelbot
Copy link
Collaborator

Test report by @boegelbot
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 1 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in total)
cns1 - Linux Rocky Linux 8.9, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2667 v3 @ 3.20GHz (haswell), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/boegelbot/f728a873014bf7536d0e0b54a728ca46 for a full test report.

@smoors
Copy link
Contributor

smoors commented May 10, 2024

@boegelbot please test @ jsc-zen3

@smoors smoors added this to the release after 4.9.1 milestone May 10, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@smoors smoors left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@smoors
Copy link
Contributor

smoors commented May 10, 2024

@boegelbot please test @ jsc-zen3

@boegelbot
Copy link
Collaborator

@smoors: Request for testing this PR well received on jsczen3l1.int.jsc-zen3.fz-juelich.de

PR test command 'if [[ develop != 'develop' ]]; then EB_BRANCH=develop ./easybuild_develop.sh 2> /dev/null 1>&2; EB_PREFIX=/home/boegelbot/easybuild/develop source init_env_easybuild_develop.sh; fi; EB_PR=20472 EB_ARGS= EB_CONTAINER= EB_REPO=easybuild-easyconfigs EB_BRANCH=develop /opt/software/slurm/bin/sbatch --job-name test_PR_20472 --ntasks=8 ~/boegelbot/eb_from_pr_upload_jsc-zen3.sh' executed!

  • exit code: 0
  • output:
Submitted batch job 4099

Test results coming soon (I hope)...

Details

- notification for comment with ID 2104429925 processed

Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me,
it is of no use to you (unless you think I have a bug, which I don't).

@boegelbot
Copy link
Collaborator

Test report by @boegelbot
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 1 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in total)
jsczen3c1.int.jsc-zen3.fz-juelich.de - Linux Rocky Linux 9.3, x86_64, AMD EPYC-Milan Processor (zen3), Python 3.9.18
See https://gist.github.com/boegelbot/2263248637c7a737c5241d733a431ef9 for a full test report.

@smoors
Copy link
Contributor

smoors commented May 10, 2024

Going in, thanks @WilleBell!

@smoors smoors merged commit d518c17 into easybuilders:develop May 10, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants