Skip to content

Add reception timestamp to fastdds SampleInfo [10492]#1737

Merged
MiguelCompany merged 3 commits intomasterfrom
feature/add-reception-timestamp
Mar 4, 2021
Merged

Add reception timestamp to fastdds SampleInfo [10492]#1737
MiguelCompany merged 3 commits intomasterfrom
feature/add-reception-timestamp

Conversation

@jparisu
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@jparisu jparisu commented Feb 4, 2021

Signed-off-by: jparisu javierparis@eprosima.com

@jparisu jparisu changed the title Add reception timestamp to fastdds SampleInfo Add reception timestamp to fastdds SampleInfo [10492] Feb 4, 2021
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@MiguelCompany MiguelCompany left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This introduces an ABI break, please add a note on versions.md

@richiware
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Build status:

  • Linux Build Status
  • Linux aarch64Build Status
  • Mac Build Status
  • Windows Build Status

@MiguelCompany MiguelCompany added this to the v2.3.0 milestone Feb 9, 2021
@jparisu jparisu force-pushed the feature/add-reception-timestamp branch from 1b49259 to ccfe310 Compare February 22, 2021 09:48
@richiprosima
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Build status:

  • Linux Build Status
  • Linux aarch64Build Status
  • Mac Build Status
  • Windows Build Status

jparisu and others added 3 commits March 4, 2021 10:30
Signed-off-by: jparisu <javierparis@eprosima.com>
Signed-off-by: jparisu <javierparis@eprosima.com>
Signed-off-by: Miguel Company <MiguelCompany@eprosima.com>
@MiguelCompany MiguelCompany force-pushed the feature/add-reception-timestamp branch from fc3854b to 0b2b095 Compare March 4, 2021 09:38
@MiguelCompany MiguelCompany merged commit 49615c9 into master Mar 4, 2021
@MiguelCompany MiguelCompany deleted the feature/add-reception-timestamp branch March 4, 2021 15:56
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants