A minimal reproduction showing the Oxlint jest and vitest plugins do not work with vite-plus/test.

The Oxlint jest and vitest plugins include rules that operate on test functions — e.g. requiring that every test has an assertion, or warning when .todo is used in a test function. These rules are triggered based on the import source of the test (or it, describe, etc.) function.

When test is imported from vite-plus/test instead of vitest, Oxlint does not recognize it as a test function, so the plugin rules silently do nothing.

import { defineConfig } from "vite-plus";

export default defineConfig({
  lint: {
    options: { typeAware: true, typeCheck: true },
    plugins: ["jest", "vitest"],
    rules: {
      "jest/expect-expect": "error",
      "vitest/warn-todo": "error",
    },
  },
  fmt: {},
});

Both the jest and vitest Oxlint plugins are enabled, and the two rules are set to "error" so that violations are easy to observe.

• Vite+

1. Install dependencies:

   vp install

2. Run the linter:

   vp lint

3. Observe the output.

All four calls in index.test.ts should produce lint errors — two jest/expect-expect errors (one per empty test body) and two vitest/warn-todo errors (one per .todo usage).

Only the two calls that use vitest's test directly produce errors. The two calls that use vite-plus/test's test produce no errors at all, even though they violate the same rules.

import { test as vpTest } from "vite-plus/test";
import { test as vitestTest } from "vitest";

// ✗ Should error (jest/expect-expect) — but does NOT
vpTest(
  "vite-plus/test does not have expected jest/expect-expect lint error",
  () => {},
);

// ✗ Should error (vitest/warn-todo) — but does NOT
vpTest.todo(
  "vite-plus/test does not have expected vitest/warn-todo lint error",
  () => {},
);

// ✓ Correctly errors (jest/expect-expect)
vitestTest("vitest does have expected jest/expect-expect lint error", () => {});

// ✓ Correctly errors (vitest/warn-todo)
vitestTest.todo(
  "vitest does have expected vitest/warn-todo lint error",
  () => {},
);

The two pairs of calls are intentionally identical in structure. The only difference is whether test comes from vite-plus/test or vitest. Oxlint recognises "vitest" as a known import source for these plugin rules but does not recognise "vite-plus/test", so the top two calls are silently ignored.