Tagging subscribers to this area: @dotnet/area-system-diagnostics-process
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

Can you provide more detailed code snippet to demonstrate what problem it solves? Can there be unit test added?

Can you provide more detailed code snippet to demonstrate what problem it solves? Can there be unit test added?

Here's a simple example: (use a project name with length greater than 15 characters)

using System.Diagnostics;

Process process = Process.GetCurrentProcess();
Console.WriteLine(process.ProcessName);

In this scenario, if the name of the current process exceeds 15 characters, it will be truncated.

using System.Diagnostics;

Process[] processes = Process.GetProcesses();
foreach (Process process in processes)
{
    Console.WriteLine($"{process.Id} - {process.ProcessName}");
}

This code results in numerous system processes having an empty ProcessName due to limitations in retrieving process infos. Furthermore, the names that are available are all truncated to 15 characters.

This limitation also affects the GetProcessesByName method. For example, to get the PID of the MTLCompilerService process:

using System.Diagnostics;

Process[] processes = Process.GetProcessesByName("MTLCompilerService");
Console.WriteLine(processes.Length); // This will be 0, even if the process is running, due to name truncation

processes = Process.GetProcessesByName("MTLCompilerServ");
Console.WriteLine(processes.Length); // This will be greater than 0 if MTLCompilerService is running

However, this approach introduces uncertainty. If two processes share the same prefix but have different suffixes, it's challenging to selectively identify one over the other.

using System.Diagnostics;

// Attempting to use "Bitwig Plug-in Host ARM64" returns 0 results due to truncation
Process[] armProcesses = Process.GetProcessesByName("Bitwig Plug-in ");
// Process[] intelProcesses = Process.GetProcessByName("Bitwig Plug-in "); ???

// How do we distinguish between ARM64 and X64 versions if both are present?
// We would again need to resort to manually filtering by filename, which is inconvenient

The GetProcessesByName method has improved because it can now retrieve PIDs of processes that would typically require elevation.
While we can't perform extensive operations on these processes without proper privileges, being able to find them and get their PIDs is better than nothing.

Regarding unit tests, it's challenging to test this functionality.
Running GetCurrentProcess during a test returns the process name as dotnet, which is consistent with the previous behaviour.
We could attempt to find a system process that is always running and has a name longer than 15 characters, but this depends on macOS not changing such a process in the future, so I'm not sure how I feel about that.

More of this was discussed in #52860 and #30909

Regarding unit tests, it's challenging to test this functionality.
Running GetCurrentProcess during a test returns the process name as dotnet, which is consistent with the previous behaviour.
We could attempt to find a system process that is always running and has a name longer than 15 characters, but this depends on macOS not changing such a process in the future, so I'm not sure how I feel about that.

For the 15 character limitation, the test could create a new process with such name and check that and for the elevated checks, I think that iterating on all the processes on the machine will be the best option for that.

There is an existing test skipped on OSX and MacCatalyst:

There is an existing test skipped on OSX and MacCatalyst:

runtime/src/libraries/System.Diagnostics.Process/tests/ProcessTests.cs

Lines 2265 to 2267 in 9fa5128

	[ActiveIssue("https://github.com/dotnet/runtime/issues/29330", TestPlatforms.OSX)]
	[Fact]
	[ActiveIssue("https://github.com/dotnet/runtime/issues/52852", TestPlatforms.MacCatalyst)]

Just delete line 2265 and 2267 from that file.

I'm having a few issues getting this test to function correctly in its current form.
I've observed that if the /bin/sleep command is relocated to a different path, it stops working, even after I remove the extended attributes and re-sign the binary.

Attempting to use a temporary script with the long name to execute the sleep command doesn't seem to resolve the issue either. This is because the process that gets executed is named bash, not the script's name.

I've observed that if the /bin/sleep command is relocated to a different path, it stops working, even after I remove the extended attributes and re-sign the binary.

I'm seeing this problem too on Sonoma. I also tried removing the signature (codesign --remove-signature ./sleep-copy) but no luck. @dotnet/area-system-diagnostics-process @wfurt any ideas?

I'm seeing this problem too on Sonoma.

I just tried this again but with System Integrity Protection disabled and now the copied binary works correctly

I just tried this again but with System Integrity Protection disabled and now the copied binary works correctly

Yes but I don't know if the OSX machines in CI run without SIP. cc @dotnet/area-infrastructure-libraries @dotnet/dnceng.