Conversation
|
Note regarding the This serves as a reminder for when your PR is modifying a ref *.cs file and adding/modifying public APIs, to please make sure the API implementation in the src *.cs file is documented with triple slash comments, so the PR reviewers can sign off that change. |
|
Tagging subscribers to this area: @tannergooding, @pgovind Issue DetailsThis PR is a part of #46675
|
|
The changes to
|
|
@tannergooding Updated |
Yes, I think so. In general, it is not very valuable to use readonly on types that are designed to be mutable, such as BitsBuffer. |
|
@jkotas Done |
|
This PR is being marked as a draft per #46675 (comment). |
jkotas
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@tannergooding I think this one is good and we can merge it. Do you agree?
Yes, just need to do a final review pass over the Sqrt refactoring |
This is one we are wanting to take. Like many small numeric types, it is conceptually its own primitive and mutating one of its two instance fields isn't really desirable. |
|
Hello @tannergooding! Because this pull request has the p.s. you can customize the way I help with merging this pull request, such as holding this pull request until a specific person approves. Simply @mention me (
|
|
I've requeued the failing job and set auto-merge. |
This PR is a part of #46675